It's just getting out of control. Is there really a health reform bill being considered that would outlaw the writing of private insurance policies? This is ridiculous and a hard copy of the bill should be printed out and promptly burned. The following links to an editorial on this specific detail in the bill.
http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=332548165656854Yesterday, I submitted the following to Senator Bayh and Senator Lugar through their comment system on their Web sites. (Had to submit three separate comments.) To voice your opinions:
http://lugar.senate.gov/contact/ http://bayh.senate.gov/contact/email/-------------------------------------------------------------
I am writing today because there are several issues compelling me to take action. I am 26 years old and have never written your office, but expect I will do so regularly in the future, if our government continues to guide our country in the current direction. I ask that you consider my opinions and represent them in the Senate.
1) Nuclear treaty with Russia. The July 6, 2009 agreement President Obama struck with President Medvedev is alarming. First, I do not agree with the decision to reduce our nuclear arms. In these unprecedented and dangerous times, when our enemies are working to procure nuclear arms, planning to destroy those we have will only serve to unnecessarily reduce our security. Secondly, Article II, Section 2 of our Constitution clearly states the President has the power "…to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur…" Obviously, the Senate must be engaged in these discussions moving forward, and I ask you to ensure this occurs.
2) Health reform. I work here in Indianapolis for a company called Mercer, the largest global and US provider of employer-sponsored health and benefit solutions, including strategic consulting, brokerage, communication and administration. My personal opinion on health reform is very much in line with that of Mercer's.
Our industry leadership position gives us a unique perspective in understanding the strengths and improvement opportunities for our health care system. We have 7,200 employees in the US, who help employers of all sizes design, fund, market and administer employee health and benefit programs that attract and retain high-performing workforces. Our clients pay a substantial portion of the nation’s health care costs and have been at the vanguard of innovative health care solutions.
Significant improvements can and should be made to better control health care costs, improve efficiencies, reduce the uninsured population and improve overall population health. I believe that those objectives can be achieved more fully and quickly by supporting and enlisting the private sector and its entrepreneurial strengths. Unnecessarily expanding government’s involvement through new, duplicative bureaucracies could destabilize the current system and increase the economic risk of rising federal budget deficits.
Mercer [and I] support an approach to US health care reform that achieves the following:
- Builds on the health insurance industry's considerable strengths rather than eroding competition and threatening the industry's viability
- Encourages and supports private sector efforts to continue to provide innovative services and new forms of more affordable access rather than duplicating existing capabilities and expanding the size and cost of government
- Allows employers to control decisions about their health plans, including providing consistent benefit plans in all locations
- Demonstrates fiscal responsiblility by funding new initiatives within existing federal budgets rather than adding to the budget deficit or raising taxes
Please let me know if you would like additional thoughts on this topic.
3) Sotomayor. I have justifiable concerns regarding Judge Sotomayor's potential appointment to the Supreme Court. I do not believe she will be good for the country and do not think she should be confirmed. Perhaps most importantly, Sotomayor's record and speeches clearly show her to support and believe in policy-making from the bench. For instance, she has written:
"Our society would be strait-jacketed were not the courts, with the able assistance of the lawyers, constantly overhauling the law and adapting it to the realities of ever-changing social, industrial and political conditions." (Judge Sonia Sotomayor and Nicole A. Gordon, "Returning Majesty to the Law and Politics: A Modern Approach," Suffolk U. L. Rev., Vol. 30, No. 35 (1996), p. 37.)
This is an alarming quote that independently should be convincing enough to not appoint her to a position of such grave importance for our country. I thank you and your staff very much for serving our country, and would appreciate your support and representation on these topics and would gladly engage in a dialogue with you on these issues.
May God bless and guide you.